Right of Reply Eunice's Attorney Lenny Silas

That our client strongly objected to the news because it was very tendentious and lacked supporting evidence, including a photo of our client and confirmation from our client to complete the news. This allowed for the creation of accurate and balanced news that complied with the requirements of article 1 of the Journalistic Code of Ethics (KEJ), which states that Indonesian journalists must be independent and produce news that is accurate, balanced, and not in bad faith. Article 3 of the Journalistic Code of Ethics states that "Indonesian journalists always test information, report in a balanced manner, do not mix judgmental facts and opinions, and apply the presumption of innocence principle; 2.

A picture of our client, Tan Paulin, who was mentioned in the popular video by Ismail Bolong, is shown in the news along with a quote. The figure is shown below.

Whereas this false reporting—which included a picture of our client's face—led to enormous losses, and as a result of this reporting, all parties believed that our client was Tan Paulin; 4. The truth is that our client, Eunike Lenny Silas, has never done as reported in the news, and this is the real issue.

- In contrast to the title's description of Tan Paulin, the image of our client's face that was published or broadcast in the news depicts a different individual; 5. Because there was no clarification or confirmation of this information provided to our clients, who instead only listened to one-sided statements, it is believed that the accusations made public have damaged our client's reputation and dignity; 6.

That in our opinion, the news reported by the media has broken the laws outlined in Law Number 40 of 1990's press-related provisions, which emphasize that the National Press has a duty to report events and opinions with respect for religious norms, a sense of decency in society, and the presumption of innocence. Similarly, in the justification.

When disseminating information, the National Press "does not judge or draw conclusions about someone's mistakes, especially for cases that are still in the trial process and can accommodate the interests of all parties involved in the reporting," according to the statement. That in relation to the aforementioned.

In light of the denial by our client and the fact that the news stories in question were not based on verifiable legal evidence, we strongly recommend that the image of our client's face be removed right away. 8.

Whereas we kindly request that the editor of the relevant media publish this information as a clarification of the news no later than one day after the date of this letter; 9. This right of reply is being provided for your consideration and consideration in accordance with Law Number 40 of 1990 Concerning the Press (Pers Law), the Journalistic Code of Ethics (Decree of the Press Council Number 03-5K-DP/III/2006), and Press Council Regulation 9/Regulation DP/X/2008 Concerning Guidelines for the Right of Reply to the Press Council. Accordingly, we bring this right of reply to your attention and consideration in accordance with those provisions.

Attorney eunike lenny silas signed the document as yours sincerely. Stella M. Masengi is a CPL2 and a SH.

Shafiq Fahmi Lubis.

That in our opinion, the news reported by the media has broken the laws outlined in Law Number 40 of 1990's press-related provisions, which emphasize that the National Press has a duty to report events and opinions with respect for religious norms, a sense of decency in society, and the presumption of innocence.